Where does a rights-hating organization go when it has
collapsed in disgrace in its own country? If it is the Million
Mom March, dedicated to destroying the right to bear arms, it
goes to the United Nations. It goes global and becomes the Billion Mom March.
On May 10th, at a press conference held in Room 226 of the UN
Secretariat Building, the new organization was launched with the
stated goal of the "worldwide year-round mobilization of a
billion mothers" against guns. The press conference was chaired
by Under-Secretary-General Jayantha Dhanapala, head of UN Dept.
of Disarmament, Donna Dees Thomases and Mindy Finklestein of
MMM, and Elvi Ruottinen of the new BMM.
The BMM had been created in March from the Women's Caucus on
Small Arms during a pre-meeting planning session of the UN
"Conference
on Illicit Trade of Small Arms in All its Aspects."
(The UN defines small arms as weapons "designed for personal
use," such as handguns, rifles and shotguns.) The active and
invited presence of "anti-gun moms" is an indication of the game
that is afoot.
The international anti-gun conference is currently meeting in
New York City (July 9-20). Its purpose is to eliminate the "wide
availability" of privately owned guns on a global level.
Although "illegal" guns are targeted, the UN clearly states that
most illegal guns begin as legally produced ones. Thus, all
governments must control the legal manufacture, transfer, and
possession of small arms, which are to be supplied exclusively
to governments and permitted only to those individuals who are
governmentally approved, e.g. individuals who are "part of
responsible military and police forces."
Mary Leigh Blek, president of MMM, is attending the
conference as a representative of an official NGO
(non-government organization). NGOs have become increasingly
influential in the UN's agenda since they form the "civil
society" enforcement arm that promotes and oversees UN approved
policies within specific nations. For example, the conference's
Preparatory Committee urged governments to work with "relevant"
NGOs to organize public events at which guns would be
conspicuously destroyed. As Blek explains, "These [guns] are
instruments of death and their toll is too painful not to do
anything to regulate the flow."
The global crusade is a God-send to MMM which has virtually
dissolved on a national level in the US. Early this year, the
organization was kicked out of the rent-free space it occupied
for two years at taxpayer expense. Thirty of the thirty-five
national staff members had been "let go" the month before.
According to CNN, the 2001 Mother's Day MMM rally in Washington,
D.C. drew only about 100 people. Meanwhile, scandal has rocked
the anti-gun moms. For example, Barbara Graham -- who helped
organize the Maryland MMM and the 2000 march in Washington, D.C.
-- was recently sentenced to 10 years to life for shooting an
innocent man whom she mistakenly blamed for killing her son.
Police found two guns by her bedside.
Things had become so bleak for MMM that it merged its
identity last month with another gun control group. The MMM
became the Million Mom March, United with the Brady Campaign and
the Brady Center or MMM,UWTBCATBC for short.
Now largely ignored by a formerly adoring media, the MMM is
warming itself on the praise of Dhanapala who calls its
participation "vital" to global disarmament. The
Under-Secretary-General invited the BMM/MMM to be active on the
global, national and regional levels but especially "through
their Legislatures and governments to ensure that the programme
of action is in fact implemented."
In short, the former "grassroots" movement has hitched its
broken wagon to a well-funded global elite. Their target is
clearly the US and the Second Amendment.
Of course, the attack is phrased in pro-woman, pro-child
language. In a statement that blends concern for both, Blek
declared that the BMM would help to ensure that no mother would
again bury a bullet-riddled child. Noeleen Heyzer, executive
director of the UN Development Fund for Women, added, "During
armed conflict, women and girls are continually threatened by
rape, domestic violence, sexual exploitation, trafficking,
sexual humiliation and mutilation."
Thus, private gun-ownership is linked to every evil "woman"
can experience. No mention is made of how women use guns to
protect themselves and their children against violence every
day. Or how most armed violence against innocents is committed
by governments to whom the UN would give a monopoly on
gun-ownership.
The MMM hopes that the UN will introduce through a side door
what it failed so miserably to achieve on the political
center-stage of America: namely, the abolition of private gun
ownership. The Conference is not merely people talking to each
other. Judging from the pre-con program, it clearly aims at
producing a legally binding agreement between nations that would
require the marking, registration, confiscation, and destruction
of all guns not used by the military, the police or other
government agencies.
The agreement would effectively override the Bill of Rights.